Neurol. pro Praxi, 2001; 4: 168-172

Význam iktových jednotek pro léčbu cévních mozkových příhod

prof. MUDr. Zdeněk Ambler, DrSc., MUDr. Jiří Polívka, CSc.
Neonatologické oddělení, FN a LF UK, Plzeň

Keywords: iktové jednotky, stroke units, cévní mozkové příhody, léčba iktů.

Published: December 31, 2001  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Ambler Z, Polívka J. Význam iktových jednotek pro léčbu cévních mozkových příhod. Neurol. praxi. 2001;2(4):168-172.

Cévní příhody mozkové - ikty - představují závažné onemocnění s vysokou mortalitou i morbiditou. Jsou třetí nejčastější příčinou úmrtí a představují asi 36 % v celkovém počtu všech srdečních a cirkulačních poruch. Bylo dosaženo již značných pokroků v primární a zejména v sekundární prevenci iktů, ale ve vlastní terapii iktů jsou pokroky dosud menší. V současné době je hlavní důraz kladen na změnu organizace péče o ikty, především v prvních fázích nemoci. Iktus musí být posuzován jako urgentní (emergentní) stav. Nezbytným předpokladem pro zahájení včasné terapie je dobrá organizace celé léčebné péče. Dosavadní zkušenosti i výsledky řady studií jednoznačně prokázaly, že organizovaná péče o pacienty na iktových jednotkách je efektivnější než péče konvenční. Budování iktových jednotek a reorganizace péče o akutní ikty jsou proto zcela oprávněné.

Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Aboderin, I., Venables, G. (1996): For the Paneuropean Consensus Meeting on stroke management: Consensus report. J. Intern. Med. 240: 173-180. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    2. Brainin, M., European Federation of Neurological Societies Task Force (1997): Neurological acute stroke care: The role of European neurology. Eur. J. Neurol. 4: 435-441. Go to original source...
    3. Glader, E-L., Stegmayr, B., Johansson, L., Hulter-Ăsberg, K., Wester, P. O. (2001): Differences in Long-Term Outcome Between Patients Treated in Stroke Units and in General Wards. A 2-Year Follow-Up of Stroke Patients in Sweden. Stroke 32: 2124-2129. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    4. Hacke, W., Kaste, M., Bogousslavsky, J., Orgogozo, J-M., Olsen, T. S., Bogousslavsky, J., Hacke, M. (2001): (on behalf of the EUSI Executive Committee) European Stroke Initiative Recommendations. Ischemic Stroke. Prophylaxis and Treatment. Information for doctors in hospitals and practice. Sanofi-Synthélabo.
    5. Indredavik, B., Slördahl, S. A., Bakke, F., Rokseth, R., Hăheim, L. L. (1997). Stroke Unit Treatment Long-term Effects. Stroke 28: 1861-1866. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. Jörgensen, H., Kammersgaard, L., Nakayama, H., Raaschou, H., Larsen, K., Hübbe, P., Olsen, T. (1999): Treatment and rehabilitation on a stroke unit improves 5-year survival. A community- based study. Stroke 30: 930-933. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Jörgensen, H., Nakayama, H., Raaschou, H., Larsen, K., Hübbe, P., Olsen, T. (1995): The effect of a stroke unit: Reductions in mortality, discharge rate to nursing home, length of hospital stay and cost. Stroke 26: 1176-1182. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    8. Kaste, M., Olsen, T. S., Orgogozo, J-M., Bogousslavsky, J., Hacke, M. (for the EUSI Executive Committee) (2000). Organization of Stroke Care: Education, Stroke Units and Rehabilitation. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 10 (suppl 3): 1-11. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    9. Langhorne, P., Dennis, M. (1998): Stroke Units: An evidence based approach. BMJ Books 1998. London. Go to original source...
    10. Nakayama, H., Jörgensen, H., Raaschou, H., Olsen, T. (1994): The influence of age on stroke outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke 25: 808-813. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. Rönning, O., Guldvog, B. (1998): Stroke units versus general medical wards. I. Twelve and eighteen-month survival. A randomized, controlled trial. Stroke 29: 58-62. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Strand, T., Asplund, K., Eriksson, S., Hagg, E., Lithner, F., Wester, P. (1985): A non-intensive stroke unit reduces functional disability and the need for longterm hospitalization. Stroke 16: 29-34. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    13. Strand, T., Asplund, K., Eriksson, S., Hagg, E., Lithner, F., Wester, P. (1986): Stroke unit care - Who benefits? Comparisons with general medical care in relation to prognostic on admission. Stroke 17: 377-381. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    14. Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration (1997): How Do Stroke Units Improve Patient Outcomes? A Collaborative Systematic Review of the Randomized Trials. Stroke 28: 2139-2144. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    15. Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration (1997): A systematic review of the randomised trials of organised inpatient (stroke unit) care after stroke. Br Med J 314: 1151-1159. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    16. Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration (2001): Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, 3. Oxford.

    Return to the content


    Neurology for Practice

    Madam, Sir,
    please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
    Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

    I declare:

    1. that I have met the above instruction
    2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited

    No
    Yes

    If your statement is not true, please be aware
    that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.