Neurol. pro Praxi, 2002; 5: 236-243

Imunopatogeneze roztroušené sklerózy

doc. RNDr. Jan Krejsek CSc1, MUDr. Otakar Kopecký CSc1, MUDr. Radomír Taláb CSc2
1 Ústav klinické imunologie a alergologie, FN a LF UK Hradec Králové
2 Neurologická klinika FN, Hradec Králové

Keywords: roztroušená skleróza, imunopatogeneze, modulace.

Published: December 31, 2002  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Krejsek J, Kopecký O, Taláb R. Imunopatogeneze roztroušené sklerózy. Neurol. praxi. 2002;3(5):236-243.

V patogenezi roztroušené sklerózy sehrává klíčovou úlohu autoimunitní imunopatologická reaktivita. V geneticky disponovaném jedinci vlivem neznámých vnějších faktorů, které velmi pravděpodobně zahrnují působení infekčních agens, dojde v CNS k uvolnění autoantigenů. Ty jsou po zpracování a vazbě na molekuly HLA prezentovány autoreaktivním T lymfocytům. Antigen prezentující buňky identifikují nebezpečné vzory, produkují pluripotentní prozánětové cytokiny (TNF) a poskytují nezbytné kostimulační signály T lymfocytům. Krevně-mozková bariéra se stává prostupnou pro lymfocyty a mononukleární fagocyty, které migrují do CNS vlivem C-C chemokinů. V poškozující zánětové reakci dominuje působení TH1 T lymfocytů a aktivovaných makrofágů. Hlavním terčem poškozujícího zánětu jsou imunodominantní epitopy strukturních molekul myelinové pochvy. Postupně dochází k intramolekulovému a intermolekulovému rozšiřování terčů autoimunitní imunopatologické reaktivity. Složky zánětu pozitivně regulují reparační procesy v CNS. Znalost patogeneze roztroušené sklerózy umožnila zavedení léků, které pozitivně modulují poškozující zánět. Jedná se o interferon a glatirameracetát. V preklinických testech jsou zkoušeny další nadějné preparáty.

Download citation

References

  1. Al-Omaishi J, Bashir R, Gendelman HE. The cellular immunology of multiple sclerosis. J. Leukoc. Biol., 1999; 65: 444-452. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Antel JP, Owens T. Immune regulation and CNS autoimmune disease. J. Neuroimmunol., 1999; 100: 181-189. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Bacon KB, Harrison JK. Chemokines and their receptors in neurobiology: perspectives in physiology and homeostasis. J. Neuroimmunol., 2000; 104: 92-97. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Bennetts BH, Teutsch SM, Buhler MM, et al. The CCR5 deletion mutation fails to protect against multiple sclerosis. Human Immunol., 1997; 58: 52-59. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Bogdan Ch. Nitric oxide and the immune response. Nature Immunol, 2001; 2 (10): 907-916. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Di Rosa F, Barnaba V. Persisting viruses and chronic inflammation: understanding their relation to autoimmunity. Immunol. Rev., 1998; 164: 17-27. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Goodnow ChC. Pathways for self-tolerance and the treatment of autoimmune diseases. Lancet, 2001; 357: 2115-2121. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Hartung HP, Kieseier BC. The role of matrix metalloproteinases in autoimmune damage to the central and peripheral nervous system. J. Neuroimmunol., 2000; 107: 140-147. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Martin R, Ruddle NH, Reingold S, et al. T helper cell differentiation in multiple sclerosis and autoimmunity. Immunol. Today, 1998; 19 (11): 495-498. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Martin R, Stürzebecher CS, McFarland HF. Immunotherapy of multiple sclerosis: Where are we? Where should we go? Nature Immunol., 2001; 2 (9): 785-788. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Noseworthy JH, Lucchinetti C, Rodriguez M, et al. Multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med., 2000; 343 (13): 938-952. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. O´Connor KC, Bar-Or A, Hafler DA. The neuroimmunology of multiple sclerosis: possible roles of T and B lymphocytes in immunopathogenesis. J. Clin. Immunol., 2001; 21 (2): 81-92. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Özenci V, Kouwenhoven M, Huang YM, et al. Multiple sclerosis: levels of interleukin-10-secreting blood mononuclear cells are low in untreated patients but augmented during interferon-?-1b treatment. Scand. J. Immunol., 1999; 49: 554-561. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Peakman M, Dayan CM. Antigen-specific immunotherapy for autoimmune disease: fighting fire with fire? Immunol., 2001; 104: 361-366. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Schwartz M. T cell mediated neuroprotection is a physiological response to central nervous system insults. J. Mol. Med., 2001; 78: 594-597. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Steinman L. Multiple sclerosis: a two-stage disease. Nature Immunol., 2001; 2(9): 762-764. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Takeuchi O, Akira S. Toll-like receptors; their physiological role and signal transduction system. Int. Immunopharmacol., 2001; 1: 625-635. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Teleshova N, Bao W, Kivisäkk P, et al. Elevated CD40 ligand expressing blood T-cell levels in multiple sclerosis are reversed by interferon-beta treatment. Scand. J. Immunol., 2000; 51: 312-320. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Wucherpfennig KW. Structural basis of molecular mimicry. J. Autoimmunity, 2001; 16: 293-302. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Yuan J, Yankner BA. Apoptosis in the nervous system. Nature, 2000; 407: 802-809. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Neurology for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.