Neurol. praxi. 2012;13(6):320-324

The importance of magnetic resonance imaging in monitoring of disease activity

MUDr.Da na Horáková, Ph.D.1, doc.MUDr.Manuela Vaněčková, Ph.D.2
1 Neurologická klinika a Centrum klinických neurověd, 1. LF UK a VFN, Praha
2 Oddělení MR, Radiodiagnostická klinika, 1. LF UK a VFN, Praha

of multiple sclerosis – a clinical neurologist insight

There has been a notable progress in research of multiple sclerosis (MS) during the last 30 years. The most important result of this effort

has been the discovery of new, more effective drugs. These drugs have on one hand brought great hope, but on the other hand they

have created new demands in approaching individual treatment. The focal question is – which drugs to use? When? And for whom? The

main reason for that is a high variability of the disease, which demands very thorough monitoring of the disease in individual patients.

Nowadays magnetic resonance imaging is the most frequently used biomarker. It helps in a diagnostic process, prognosis, and disease

monitoring. New diagnostic criteria from 2011 enable us to confirm the diagnosis of MS from the first MRI examination, which significantly

shortens the time before starting treatment. After treatment has started, we recommend to continue with a quantitative MRI

protocol that shows, even in a routine practice, not only quantification of lesions, but also total and regional brain atrophy which better

reflects the neurodegenerative processes.

Keywords: multiple sclerosis, magnetic resonance imaging, disease activity, brain atrophy, biomarker

Published: December 1, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Da na H, Vaněčková M. The importance of magnetic resonance imaging in monitoring of disease activity. Neurol. praxi. 2012;13(6):320-324.
Download citation

References

  1. Anderson VM, Fox NC, Miller DH. Magnetic resonance imaging measures of brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 23(5): 605-618. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Barkhof F. The clinico-radiological paradox in multiple sclerosis revisited. Curr Opin Neurol 2002; 15(3): 239-245. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Barkhof F, Calabresi PA, Miller DH, Reingold SC., ,Imaging outcomes for neuroprotection and repair in multiple sclerosis trials." Nat Rev Neurol 2009; 5(5): 256-266. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Daumer M, Neuhaus A, Morrissey S, Hintzen R, Ebers GC. MRI as an outcome in multiple sclerosis clinical trials. Neurology 2009; 72(8): 705-711. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Fisniku LK, Chard DT, Jackson JS, Anderson VM, Altmann DR, Miszkiel KA, Thompson AJ, Miller DH. Gray matter atrophy is related to long-term disability in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2008; 64(3): 247-254. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Ge Y, Grossman RI, Babb JS, Rabin ML, Mannon LJ, Kolson DL. Age-related total gray matter and white matter changes in normal adult brain. Part I: volumetric MR imaging analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23(8): 1327-1333.
  7. Havrdová E. Časná diagnostika a diferenciální diagnostika roztroušené sklerózy. Neurologie pro praxi Supplementum (C): 2012: C5-C7.
  8. Horaková D, Kalincik T, Blahova Dusankova J, Dolezal O. Clinical correlates of grey matter pathology in multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurol 2012; 12: 10. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Horakova D, Kalincik T, Dolezal O, Krasensky J, Vaneckova M, Seidl Z, Havrdova E. Early predictors of non-response to interferon in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 2002; 126(6): 390-397. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Kalincik T, Vaneckova M, Tyblova M, Krasensky J, Seidl Z, Havrdova E, Horakova D. Volumetric MRI markers and predictors of disease activity in early multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal cohort study. PlosS One In press 2012. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Kappos L, Moeri D, Radue EW, Schoetzau A, Schweikert K, Barkhof F, Miller D, Guttmann CR, Weiner HL, Gasperini C, Filippi M. Predictive value of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for relapse rate and changes in disability or impairment in multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis. Gadolinium MRI Meta-analysis Group. Lancet 1999; 353(9157): 964-969. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Peterson JW, Bo L, Mork S, Chang A, Trapp BD. Transected neurites, apoptotic neurons, and reduced inflammation in cortical multiple sclerosis lesions. Ann Neurol 2001; 50(3): 389-400. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen JA, Filippi M, Fujihara K, Havrdová E, Hutchinson M, Kappos L, Lublin FD, Montalban X, O'Connor P, Sandberg-Wollheim M, Thompson AJ, Waubant E, B. Weinshenker B, Wolinsky JS. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 2011; 69(2): 292-302. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Prentice RL. Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: definition and operational criteria. Stat Med 1989; 8(4): 431-440. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Rio J, Castillo J, Rovira A, Tintore M, Sastre-Garriga J, Horga A, Nos C, Comabella M, Aymerich X, Montalban X. Measures in the first year of therapy predict the response to interferon beta in MS. Mult Scler 2009; 15(7): 848-853. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Sormani MP, Bonzano L, Roccatagliata L, De Stefano N. Magnetic resonance imaging as surrogate for clinical endpoints in multiple sclerosis: data on novel oral drugs. Mult Scler 2011; 17(5): 630-633. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Sormani MP, Stubinski B, Cornelisse P, Rocak S, Li D, De Stefano N. Magnetic resonance active lesions as individual-level surrogate for relapses in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2011; 17(5): 541-549. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Tintore M, Rovira A, Arrambide G, Mitjana R, Rio J, Auger C, Nos C, Edo MC, Castillo J, Horga A, Perez-Miralles F, Huerga E, Comabella M, Sastre-Garriga J, Montalban X. Brainstem lesions in clinically isolated syndromes. Neurology 2010; 75(21): 1933-1938. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Trapp BD, Peterson J, Ransohoff RM, Rudick R, Mork S, Bo L. Axonal transection in the lesions of multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 1998; 338(5): 278-285. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Vaneckova M, Kalincik T, Krasensky J, Horakova D, Havrdova E, Hrebikova T, Seidl Z. Corpus callosum atrophy - a simple predictor of multiple sclerosis progression: a longitudinal 9-year study. Eur Neurol 2012; 68(1): 23-27. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Vaněčková M, Seidl Z, Krásenský J, Horáková D, Havrdová E, Němcová E, Daneš J. Naše zkušenosti s MR monitorováním pacientů s roztroušenou sklerózou v klinické praxi. Česká Slovenská Neurologie a Neurochirurgie 2010; 73(106 (4): 716-720.
  22. Wang YC, Sandrock A, Richert JR, Meyerson L, Miao X. Short-Term Relapse Quantitation as a Fully Surrogate Endpoint for Long-Term Sustained Progression of Disability in RRMS Patients Treated with Natalizumab. Neurol Res Int 2011: ID 195831 2011. Go to original source...




Neurology for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.