Neurol. praxi. 2015;16(5):280-285

Evaluation of electronic forms for the assessment of spinal cord injured patients

MUDr. Jiří Kříž, Ph.D., MUDr. Renata Háková, Mgr. Zuzana Hlinková, Mgr. Barbora Frgalová, MUDr. Veronika Hyšperská, Mgr. Šárka Špaňhelová
Spinální jednotka při Klinice rehabilitace a tělovýchovného lékařství 2. LF UK a FN v Motole, Praha

Detailed neurological and functional examination is fundamental for the evaluation of the development after spinal cord injury. European Multicenter Study about Spinal Cord Injury (EMSCI) has significantly contributed to standardization of processes of investigation. Their widening is going on in the Czech Republic in form of courses on the examination of a spinal cord injured patient organised by the Spinal Cord Unit Prague, University Hospital Motol. Electronic forms could help to simplify processing of obtained information, unify outputs and make the medical documentation better arranged.

Keywords: spinal cord injury, neurological assessment, functional assessment, spasticity, standardization, electronic form

Published: October 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kříž J, Háková R, Hlinková Z, Frgalová B, Hyšperská V, Špaňhelová Š. Evaluation of electronic forms for the assessment of spinal cord injured patients. Neurol. praxi. 2015;16(5):280-285.
Download citation

References

  1. Curt A, Schwab ME, Dietz V. Providing the clinical basis for new interventional therapies: refined diagnosis and assessment of recovery after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2004; 42: 1-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Chafetz RS, Prak S, Mulcahey MJ. Computerized Classification of Neurologic Injury Based on the International Standards for Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2009; 32: 532-537. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Itzkovich M, Gelernter I, Biering-Sorensen F, Weeks C, Laramee MT, Craven BC et al. The Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) version III: reliability and validity in a multi-center international study. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29: 1926-1933. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Kirshblum SC, Waring W, Biering-Sorensen F, Burns SP, Johansen M, Schmidt-Read M et al. Reference for the 2011 revision of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2011; 34: 547-554. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Kříž J, Háková R, Hyšperská V, Hlinková Z, Lukáš R, Andel R. Mezinárodní standardy pro neurologickou klasifikaci míšního poranění - revize 2013. Cesk Slov Neurol N 2014; 77/110: 77-81.
  6. van Hedel HJ, Wirz M, Dietz V. Standardized assessment of walking capacity after spinal cord injury: the European network approach. Neurol Res 2008; 30: 61-73. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Rupp R, Schweidler J, Curt A, Dietz V, Gerner H. An electronic tool for multicenter administration, assessment and analysis of clinical trials in spinal cord injury. Biomedizinische Technik 2005; Suppl 1: 1460-1461.
  8. Schuld C, Wiese J, Franz S, Putz C, Stierle I, Smoor I et al. Effect of formal training in scaling, scoring and classification of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. Spinal Cord 2013; 51: 282-288. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Schuld C, Wiese J, Hug A, Putz C, Hedel HJ, Spiess MR et al. Computer implementation of the international standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury for consistent and efficient derivation of its subscores including handling of data from not testable segments. J Neurotrauma 2012; 29: 453-461. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Neurology for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.